|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
January 6, 2007 I decided to have a look at Gentoo Linux. I'm an old Gentoo fan/user but I haven't installed it on any of my servers for a while.. this Ubuntu thing had been working so well and all. The Live-CD was kinda neat. I got to a Gnome desktop and tried the curses-based installer. It ran and I went to bed since it was pretty late already. The installer crashed sometime during the night and gave me an unbootable system. I restarted the LiveCD and tried the GTK installer next. The GTK installer finished with no errors. I rebooted and the system came up. Yay! I tried to run `emerge sync` and was prompted to use the new syntax `emerge --sync` instead. So I did. I couldn't sync though as I had no network connection. I tracked the problem back to the fact that I had no default gateway set. I set one in the install, no idea what happened. Digging deeper I found there was some odd looking syntax in my /etc/conf.d/net file: routes_eth0="( "default via 10.0.0.1" )" I changed that to: routes_eth0="default via 10.0.0.1" and restarted the networking. It produced some errors: * No loaded modules provide "broadcast" (broadcast_start) but seemed to fix my network issue. So now I'm emerging vim and trying to figure out why I have an eth0 alias:
# ifconfig eth0:1
eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:78:18:4B:FB
inet addr:10.255.255.255 Bcast:10.255.255.255
Mask:255.0.0.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
Interrupt:10 Base address:0x6800
Fun!
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
strange installer behaviour
By: manlio <manlio dot garavaglia at libero dot it>
Posted: 1 year ago
wrong syntax:
routes_eth0="( "default via 10.0.0.1" )"
right syntax:
routes_eth0=( "default via 10.0.0.1" )
The same as for config_eth0 syntax:
config_eth0=( "10.0.0.<your address> brd 10.0.0.255 netmask 255.255.255.0" )
it seems that the installer writes off a wrong syntax :(
I spent one afternoon to discover that this was the problem, but if you look at net.example you have the right syntax ;)